Search for: "RIDER v. STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm by Cicely Wilson
Accordingly, the court vacated and remanded for trial.Read More: Marvel Must Defend ‘Ghost Rider’ Copyright, Court SaysHitchcock v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:39 am by Orin Kerr
In People v Nappo (94 NY2d 564 [2000]), we held that the State was not the “owner” of uncollected taxes within the meaning of the statutory definition of the term because “taxes due were not the property of the State prior to their remittance” (id. at 566). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 7:17 pm by Steve Gottlieb
The Supreme Court, the one in Washington, heard argument Monday in Janus v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm by Jason Starling
By Jason Starling In what looks to be an ominous development for public-sector unions, the United States Supreme Court, on June 30, 2015, granted a petition for certiorari by the plaintiffs in Friedrichs v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am by Unknown
Title V of Division AA of the FY23 appropriations bill would provide for a registration exemption for small business mergers and acquisitions brokers by amending Exchange Act Section 15(b) to add a new subsection (13). [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
A complete discussion in North Carolina would also need to include State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 1:26 am
Presentment Agency, appellant NEW YORK COUNTYTorts Question of Fact Exists of Whether BMX Bike Rider Unreasonably Increased Skateboarder's Risk of Injury Allouche v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by Steve Davies
”  “If I were not constrained by which I believe is binding precedent from the Ninth Circuit, and on-point precedent from other circuits, I would hold Section 1713 [Tester’s rider] is unconstitutional because it violates the Separation of Powers doctrine articulated by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am by Alicia Maule
” — Parker Rider-Longmaid, one of Rodney Reed’s attorneys — April 19, 2023 The Court’s opinion in Reed v. [read post]