Search for: "ROGERS v. BROWN"
Results 241 - 260
of 515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2013, 3:53 am
Oddly -- or not -- Judge Janice Rogers Brown didn't join Judge Judith Rogers's opinion, opting instead to concur in the judgment only. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Archis Parasharami discusses yesterday’s denial of certiorari in Marek v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 12:02 pm
Circuit's Judge Janice Rogers Brown taking down the Obamacare contraceptive mandate in Gilardi v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:21 am
Judge Janice Rogers Brown wrote the main opinion issued on Friday, which drew varying support from her two colleagues. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Brown (9th Cir., brief filed Oct. 8, 2013). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:55 am
The defence asserts this proposition notwithstanding the uncontroverted evidence that the plaintiff’s hip and lower back injuries markedly limit her ability to do the kind of work that she actually did, and did well, before her injury. [53] It is disappointing that in this day and age, nearly 30 years after Brown v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
Although discerning judges’ ultimate views based on questions at an oral argument is an inherently risky undertaking, questions from Judge Janice Rogers Brown at Monday’s argument in al Bahlul v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
The judges took turns testing this theory, Judge Kavanaugh by noting the Supreme Court’s seemingly equation, in Justice Kennedy’s Hamdan I concurrence and other places, of the law of war with international law; Judge Janice Rogers Brown, by asking whether the government meant to rest on a purely “domestic common law of war” theory, or the theory that U.S. practice serves to delimit inexact boundaries in international law; and Judge David Tatel, by wondering… [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm
Put simply, the government would need at least two votes from the quartet of Chief Judge Garland and Judges Griffith, Rogers, and Tatel (and that’s assuming that the government is likely to have Judges Henderson and Brown on its side–hardly a foregone conclusion). [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:19 am
The en banc panel includes Judges Merrick Garland, Karen LeCraft Henderson, Judith Rogers, David Tatel, Janice Rogers Brown, Thomas Griffith, and Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
That too was granted by the three-judge panel composed of Circuit Court Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Janice Rogers Brown and Thomas Griffith. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:23 pm
Bush administration, among whom it’s hard to think of anyone comparable to the above list, with the possible exception of Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Stay tuned for updates. 80/20 Inc v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm
This afternoon, Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Janice Rogers Brown, and Thomas B. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
The lower court opinion In the First Amendment community, Judge Janice Rogers Brown, currently on the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:21 am
A three-judge district court, in an opinion by Judge Janice Rogers Brown, upheld the law over a First Amendment challenge. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm
The 2004 case was Fellers v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
Like the court in Brown v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
In Hart v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:32 am
Brown v. [read post]
