Search for: "ROSE v. DEFENSE " Results 241 - 260 of 826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
First, the monetary value of the top workplace class action settlements rose dramatically in 2017. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am by Rachel Sandler
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 [4] CCA & B, LLC., v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Tripp, Houston, Texas, for amici Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. and Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For the women raped years ago, the rape SOLs were short then, and the Supreme Court has made it impossible to give them a second chance at criminal prosecution under Stogner v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm by Bernie Burk
  For as the Times is now reporting (here), in July of this year Boies’ firm had retained Black Cube on Weinstein’s behalf, hiring them for what the contract Boies signed stated were the “primary objectives” of providing “intelligence which will help the client’s efforts to completely stop the publication of a new negative article in a leading NY Newspaper” (which Farrow identifies as the Times) and obtaining content from a book that was to include… [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am by Philip Segal
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Nevertheless, plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the account stated claim cannot be granted as to the other amounts billed, because plaintiff has not demonstrated entitlement to dismissal of defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaims, which are sufficiently intertwined with the account stated claim so as to provide a bona fide defense (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept 2013], lv… [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Introduction With cat-like tread, Ohio’s Commercial Activity Tax (CAT) strode into view in 2005, unleashing a torrent of criticism, concerns, timid defenses, and regrettable puns. [read post]
The panel rejected Omnia’s invocation of the common-law defense known as the Tea Rose-Rectanus doctrine, which protects good-faith use of a mark in a “remote geographic area,” holding that Omnia’s admitted knowledge of Stone Creek’s prior use defeated any such claim. [read post]