Search for: "Railway Company v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 6:38 am
Lewis v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
This is not unproblematic: the European Union undertakes here the same unilateralism that it used to criticize when previously done by the United States, with the Helms/Burton Act as the most prominent example. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Application of the commissioned sales employee overtime exemption to a company that sells an internet payment software platform. 5. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
Since 2003, a third of the net new jobs created in the United States were in Texas. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:00 pm
Doyle, Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
BNSF Railway Co., 2009 WL 2731154 (D. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:59 am
· In 1911, the first workers' compensation laws were enacted in the United States on an enduring basis. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:21 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
United States, 136 S. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP) Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46) Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Dawn Harris-Young, EPA, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and hazardous materials laws for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, S.C., the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
Johnstone and Canadian National Railway v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
That is the necessary implication of Rumsfeld v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
