Search for: "Rather v. Rather" Results 241 - 260 of 76,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2009, 2:03 am
Mr Justice Hedley has been rather busy. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 5:57 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Of these, the only 19th Century case is Tilghman v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Not a Third Circuit case -- rather, a case decided by a federal district court within the Third Circuit.Akinola v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:52 pm
An audio recording of this morning's oral argument in Wheeler v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 8:35 am
Today's advance release family law opinion: Gershon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:24 am
The interpretation of a “management right’s clause” in a collective bargaining agreement is for the arbitrator rather than PERB to resolveRoma v Ruffo, Court of Appeals, 92 NY2d 489The collective bargaining agreement between the Susquehanna Valley Central School District and CSEA Local 1000 provided that school matrons would normally work an eight-hour day/40-hour work week and that the district would negotiate any changes in the matron’s working conditions… [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Randall Peterson
  Rather than seek permission from the Securities and Exchange Commission to exclude the proposal, the usual approach, the company instead filed suit (Apache v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 2:09 pm
I don’t generally like to play first to post, and would rather wait to see what I can add to the discussion of any particular issue before posting on a breaking story. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:37 am by traceydennis
Batista v Secretary of State of the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 896; [2010] WLR (D) 233 “When considering whether a decision to deport a national of the European Economic Area (‘EEA’) was proportionate, the court should ask itself whether members of the deportee’s family would move to the country of origin with the deportee and whether it was reasonable to expect them to do so, rather than to ask whether there were ‘insurmountable obstacles’… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:22 am by Anthony Lake
The Court's holding in Apprendi led to its holding that the United States Sentencing Guidelines were advisory, rather than mandatory, five years later, in United States v. [read post]