Search for: "Reas v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2020, 9:04 am
United States: The Court continues to clarify the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:40 am
She got one, and she got convicted.The case is United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 10:04 am
” In Begay v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:17 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:27 pm
” Following United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:45 am
In general, an EU regulation leaves Member States with the discretion to decide whether to create criminal offences in their domestic legislation. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 8:22 am
It was meant to retain effective state control of the non state sector will effectively devolving operational tasks (at the lowest levels of consumer goods and services) to individuals. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
Véase El Condominio: El Régimen de Propiedad Horizontal en Puerto Rico (2nda Ed. 2019). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:47 am
” This is a type of offence for which the there is no need for the Crown to prove mens rea (the accused’s mental state); the mere fact that the prohibited act was done constitutes the offence. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Kahler v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
"] From DeMare v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
Despite lacking the mens rea to commit their offences, both individuals were found guilty. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
Despite lacking the mens rea to commit their offences, both individuals were found guilty. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, in which the court faced the question whether the First Amendment requires a minimum showing of mens rea, or criminal intent. [read post]
