Search for: "Reed v. High"
Results 241 - 260
of 661
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Saadi v UK (App no. 13229/03). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
See Mulraney v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm
Handelman v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 8:33 am
In this guest post, she shares her thoughts and updates us on the related developments.Pemetrexed pops up in MilanGuest Kat Eibhlin gives takes us through the recent decision handed down by the Court of Milan which forms part of the long running multi-jurisdictional battle concerning Eli Lilly's patent protecting its pemetrexed (Alimta) product.Medical data in a twist - Technomed v BluecrestGuest Kat Rosie demystifies database rights with the recent decision of Technomed v… [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
2005: SEC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm
” [Nicholas Malfitano, Penn Record/Forbes, earlier on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
Without a doubt, the appellants must surely be equally delighted with the outcome in their case because Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Clarke and Reed unanimously held that the burden of proving a “marriage of convenience” falls on the Home Office. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am
” That memo cites a quote from an 1882 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Towing Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 12:06 pm
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
A high standard of proof was required to prove fraud in the European context. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
John Stark Reed Readers undoubtedly are aware of the recent outbreak of ransomware incidents and the problems they present. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 2:00 am
In a landmark case titled Valley Forge Towers Apartments N, LP, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm
That was probably the high point for the SoS WP’s case. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 10:03 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:01 am
The second challenge was dismissed in October 2014 by the High Court, but permission was given for the decisions in both Unison 1 and Unison 2 to come before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
