Search for: "Reining v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
However, it limited the scope of the injunction to foreign nationals with a bona fide relationship to a person or entity in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
The Court has simply made it clear that if the United States courts are to become a sort of human rights policeman to the world, it is Congress that will need to decide to fit them out for that task. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 6:04 am by Scott R. Anderson, Molly E. Reynolds
Beginning on Jan. 20, 2022, and every four years thereafter—cleverly scheduled to fall one year after the inauguration day for each new presidential term—the president must provide Congress with a report on the activities that the United States is pursuing under the 2018 AUMF and make a recommendation as to whether Congress should repeal, modify, or leave the 2018 AUMF in place. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves how to determine the precedential effect of Supreme Court decisions with no majority opinion, for this blog. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Benjamin Alter
At the same time, the United States is increasingly relying on economic coercion to advance its interests. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm by William Ford
United States or permitted by the court’s decision in Munaf v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Michael Brendan Dougherty explains why he has “started to think that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy may be the one man preventing the United States from political breakdown. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:43 pm by Cindy Cohn
Dear friends, Today, the United States Congress struck a significant blow against the basic human right to read, write, learn, and associate free of government’s prying eyes. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Bain, Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Washington, D.C., for amici Ad Hoc Copyright Coalition; Commercial Internet Exchange; Computer & Communications Industry Association; Information Technology Association of America; Netcoalition.com; United States Internet Industry Association, and United States Telecommunications Association. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, “[a]t least six justices seemed keen to widen the Fourth Amendment umbrella for the digital age, but no single way to do so emerged. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Orin Kerr
The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an important electronic privacy case, United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The compromise was that the federal courts could effectively overturn a state judgment on a ground decided by the state courts if that decision was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Nigeria It is reported that the High Court has awarded Kingsley Kuku damages of N10 million against the Abuja Inquirer United States President Trump is seeking to have a defamation claim against him dismissed, arguing that the statement that women accusing him of sexual misconduct were “liars” is simply an expression of opinion. [read post]