Search for: "Rent v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 4,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2009, 5:25 am
In Cortez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The case, Newman Development Group of Pottstown, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The case, Newman Development Group of Pottstown, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The case, Newman Development Group of Pottstown, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The case, Newman Development Group of Pottstown, LLC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 9:10 pm
Here the tenancy agreement provided for a monthly rent of £1,950 but also stated 'Payment required in advance of £4,200?. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 3:14 pm
Scott had no intention of returning.Although by renting a residence in Kelowna, Dr. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:01 pm
See Fromer v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:18 am
Prempeh v Lakhany (2020) EWCA Civ 1422 We saw this case on a first appeal in the County Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
In 2005, the United States Congress enacted the Graves Amendment. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 12:04 am
In Taylor v Mina An Ltd [2019] UKUT 249 (LC) the Upper Tribunal has overturned a refusal of a Rent Repayment Order by the First Tier Tribunal. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am
Holland & Knight v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 1:21 pm
Samuels v Birmingham City Council (2019) UKSC 28 The Supreme Court, finally, has delivered its judgment on the issue of the assessment of ‘reasonable expenses’ when considering the affordability of rent in homelessness decisions. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:01 am
In PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:41 am
You do know that rent-a-e-scooters are death sticks, right? [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Jones v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 6:12 am
Two of those measures came before the Second Circuit.The case is Melendez v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:02 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
These “sale and rent back” schemes operated during a period when sale and rent back transactions were common yet unregulated. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 3:04 pm
That's enough, the Ninth Circuit holds, to immunize the United States, which owned and rented the defective boat, from suit. [read post]
