Search for: "Rick Pildes"
Results 241 - 260
of 260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2008, 11:37 am
Rick PildesWhenever the Court divides 5-4 in high-profile cases along lines conventionally considered ideological, as in today's campaign-finance decision that holds unconstitutional the "Millionaire's Amendment" provision of the McCain-Feingold law, the temptation is to process the decision in those same ideological terms: the decision must be a victory for politically "conservative" views of campaign-finance regulation and a defeat for "liberal"… [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:06 pm
Here, on Hasen's election law blog. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:46 am
Here is a guest post from Rick Pildes: For those who teach legislation, are interested in statutory interpretation, or are just curious, I want to recommend an engaging book I just finished that is likely to fall below the radar... [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:50 am
An election law blog notes that my colleague Rick Pildes noted that the case illustrates the Court's trend away from the maximal enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:01 pm
Rick Pildes argues that the decision reflects a trend, which began in the 1990s, of "greater skepticism from the Court" "regarding the boundaries of the special coverage regime under Section 5 of the Act. [read post]
28 May 2008, 4:51 am
In addition to this insightful post from Rick Pildes, coverage of yesterday's Section 5 decision in Riley v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:25 am
Rick Pildes sent the following message to the election law listserv, reprinted by permission: What is the significance of today's somewhat technical decision from the Supreme Court in the Riley case regarding the Voting Rights Act? [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
I was struck by the comments of both Rick Pildes and Pam Karlan. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:58 am
Following up on this post, see Bob Bauer and Rick Pildes.... [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
[ADDENDUM: I should have been clearer in my original post that the "institutional warfare" is a function of what Rick Pildes and Darryl Levinson have called the "separation of parties" more than the "separation of powers" per se. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 3:55 pm
Ellen Katz has written this commentary and Rick Pildes has written this commentary. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Unfortunately, this hasn't happened and according to Rick Hasen's recent article "The Untimely Death of Bush v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:41 am
As several members of my field have argued (Pam Karlan, Guy Charles, and Ellen Katz, with Rick Pildes on the other side, in essays all available here), in LULAC Kennedy offered a surprisingly sunny vision of race and demonstrated a noteworthy willingness to draw connections between political association and racial identity. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:30 pm
Rick Pildes more sensibly says... [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:30 am
Or, as he and his co-author Rick Pildes put it in a subsequent Harvard Law Review article, "Separation of Parties, Not Powers. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:20 pm
Rick Pildes of NYU weighs in here, and Rick Hasen of Loyola Law School has his thoughts here. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 3:26 pm
Some early news reports: AP Bloomberg Reuters Legal Times (Tony Mauro/Law.com) Blogospheric reaction: Rick Pildes Marty Lederman Richard Briffault Bob Bauer Interest group reaction: Gerry Hebert, Campaign Legal Center Democracy 21 My initial reactions are here. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:20 am
Rick Pildes of NYU weighs in here, and Rick Hasen of Loyola Law School has his thoughts here. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:33 am
(Rick Pildes has a nice explanation of the case's significance here.) [read post]
15 May 2007, 5:24 am
Over at the Virginia Law Review's In Brief, there is a marvelous exchange between Adam Cox & Rick Pildes:The Temporal Dimension of Voting RightsEssay by Adam B. [read post]
