Search for: "Roche Holdings, Inc."
Results 241 - 253
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2007, 8:11 pm
Apotex, Inc., No. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:09 pm
Ill. filed Apr. 20, 2007), and Roche v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 917 A.2d 767 (N.J. 2007), reversed another case (relied upon by the Appellate Division), finding it improper to apply New Jersey product liability (not consumer fraud) standards nationwide.While we correctly predicted the result, we were dead wrong about the rationale the supreme court chose to get there. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:50 pm
A federal district court in Arizona has preliminarily enjoined the enforcement of the Arizona business combination statute and control share statute with respect to Roche Holding AG's hostile bid for Ventana Medical Systems Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 618 N. [read post]
28 May 2007, 8:21 pm
VP & Chief IP Counsel, Allergan, Inc. and author of The Generic Challenge) and Robert C. [read post]
28 May 2007, 5:17 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
"The Draft continues to use the "carve at the joint" metaphor from In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 51 F.3d 1293 (7th Cir. 1995) (e.g., §2.03, comment c & Reporters' Notes) to justify widespread issue certification, even though Rhone-Poulenc used that phrase not in support of issue certification, but to caution against bifurcating a trial in a way that would have different juries examining the same issue in violation of the Seventh Amendment. 51 F.3d… [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
Yet, the Chairman and the bipartisan participation manifested a determination to find a solution, best marked by the announcement of the intention of the Chairman to hold a markup hearing in May - which, coincidentally or not - will take place in all likelihood shortly after the KSR decision is reached by the Supreme Court, and possibly before the Supreme Court Microsoft decision. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 8:15 am
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., reversing an appellate court that had misapplied basic conflict-of-laws principles to hold that New Jersey law applied to any suit filed in New Jersey against a New Jersey... [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
In Embrex, we followed the teachings of Roche and Pitcairn to hold that the defense was very narrow and limited to actions performed "for a [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 5:00 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
