Search for: "Rowe v. Rowe"
Results 241 - 260
of 4,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2014, 6:20 am
Briefly: In a post for the Brennan Center for Justice, Andrew Cohen discusses comments by Justice Antonin Scalia, made during the oral argument in Hall v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 7:09 am
Supreme Court will hear arguments in Baze v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:36 am
" This case, from the First Circuit, is Rowe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 6:19 pm
Started on Doherty, but on closer inspection, the Lords have also given me R (On The Application of M) (Fc) V Slough Borough Council and R (On The Application of Heffernan) (Fc) V The Rent Service to deal with, and possibly also Yeoman’s Row Management Limited and Another V Cobbe. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:52 am
Peyton," his posting continued, "it ruled that federal courts should not allow a death-row inmate [read post]
31 May 2016, 1:44 am
The Connecticut State Supreme Court has upheld the abolishment of the death penalty, including for death-row inmates in the re-examination of the case of State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:07 pm
Lavan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 5:56 am
(Chester v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:56 am
R (Buglife) v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
In A Square Peg in a Round Hole - Building Design v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 7:19 am
More on the Alabama case of Wood v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 3:54 am
Kosten v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:32 am
In three opinions issued today, the Supreme Court reversed the convictions of Texas death row inmates. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court ruled against a death row inmate who directed his lawyer not to present evidence that could spare him, then argued... [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 11:46 am
Medtronic and Rowe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:27 am
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:05 pm
Last year in this post, I described a Ninth Circuit panel decision in Comer v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:08 am
Last year, in District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Rowe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:02 pm
Rowe v Fisher, 2011 NY Slip Op 01721 (1st Dept. 2011) “The motion court properly precluded plaintiffs’ expert testimony on chelation because the expert’s theories were contrary to the medical literature on the subject and therefore “unreliable” (Parker v Mobile Oil Corp., 7 NY3d 434, 447 [2006]). [read post]
