Search for: "Rules of Discipline v. Rules"
Results 241 - 260
of 4,399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2023, 8:57 am
The court’s ruling is wrong, but I’m not thrilled with HK’s choices either. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 10:11 am
Second, the Supreme Court issued the Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Firearms Instructor Villafane testified about petitioner’s firearms rules and regulations (Tr. 26-27, 35). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Firearms Instructor Villafane testified about petitioner’s firearms rules and regulations (Tr. 26-27, 35). [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
The order sets forth who can classify and declassify information, which categories of information can be classified, marking and handling instructions for classified records, and several other rules and restrictions. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 3:29 am
Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v Clayton County, which held that Title VII’s ban on sex discrimination also extended to transgender and gay workers. [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:30 pm
The seminal case of Pepper v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:15 am
The Duty to Respond to Public Comments In Perez v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm
The grave risk exception “is to be interpreted narrowly, lest it swallow the rule In re Lozano, 809 F. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process A public school district is not an "education corporation or association" within… [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process A public school district is not an "education corporation or association" within… [read post]
ALERT: CHANGE IN LAW – RETALIATION PROTECTION NOW GIVEN TO EMPLOYEES COMPLAINING OF KNOWN VIOLATIONS
25 May 2023, 1:40 pm
Garcia-Brower v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
"] From C.M. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 2:21 pm
The school district argued in Kennedy that it had to discipline the coach in order to avoid violating the Establishment Clause—more specifically, to avoid violating the endorsement test under the Lemon line of cases—and also because the coach's practice of praying midfield could coerce students in violation of a different line of cases, including Lee v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 8:11 am
" See Greenberg v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
Petitioner was served with a notice of discipline setting out six charges of misconduct alleging violations of the agency's rules, regulations and code of conduct. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
Petitioner was served with a notice of discipline setting out six charges of misconduct alleging violations of the agency's rules, regulations and code of conduct. [read post]
