Search for: "Russel Thomas" Results 241 - 260 of 1,073
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from Jeremy Dys in an op-ed at Fox News, Andrew Seidel at Rewire.News, Thomas Ascik at National Review, and Marty Lederman at Balkinization. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Cosby, in which Thomas called on the court to “abandon New York Times v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law.com, Tony Mauro reports that Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with the result, but would have relied on the privileges or immunities clause, which Thomas has long argued provides “a stronger rationale for justifying fundamental rights than the due process clause. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Many of the citations deal with eminently practical matters, but the courts have also thought it beneficial to call upon the philosophers for a variety of more strictly “philosophic” notions, for example, Thomas Aquinas on the doctrine of free will, and Bertrand Russell on logical constructions. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
’” Additional coverage comes from Thomas DeLorenzo at Jurist. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Allen and conversation with Thomas Wright. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
Tool Without A Handle: “A Mere Gallimaufry” This blog has spent a good deal of real estate discussing networked information technologies as tools, but has not yet dealt thoroughly with the qualifier in its title: tools “without handles. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
Kaiser, Legal Challenges of Automated and Autonomous Systems Nicholas Tsagourias & Russell Buchan, Automatic Cyber Defence and the Laws of War Antje von Ungern-Sternberg, Artifical Agents and General Principles of Law Walther Schücking Lecture Philip Allott, Beyond War and Diplomacy: A Giant Step for Mankind Special Section: Towards Utopia – Rethinking International Law Jens T. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:09 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the petitioner in Michaels. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Last Month in the Courts On 17 December 2018 Nicklin J heard the trial of a preliminary issue on meaning in the case of Tinkler v Thomas and gave judgment ([2018] EWHC 3563 (QB)). [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 6:06 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, December 7, 2018 Tags: Brexit, Capital formation, Cybersecurity, Investor protection, LIBOR, Proxy voting, SEC, SEC enforcement, SEC rulemaking, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting CEO Transitions: Mitigating Risks and Accelerating Value Creation Posted by Rusty O’Kelley, Russell Reynolds Associates, on Sunday, December 9, 2018 … [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
It was a “Hormel Update,” which was provided by Lori Marco and Tyson Redpath, both with Hormel Foods, and Randy Russell of the Russell Group. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The second episode of Media Law Podcast has a debate between Dr Thomas Bennett and Dr Paul Wragg under the title “Invasion of Privacy – What’s the harm? [read post]