Search for: "Russell et al" Results 241 - 260 of 409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2011, 11:57 am by Amanda Frost
  (Disclaimer:  Goldstein & Russell represents the NAACP Legal Defense Fund et al. as amici curiae in support of respondent.) [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:25 am by Ed Wallis
” The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) also earlier this year: Newer-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs and the Risk of Major Birth Defects JAMA, 05/19/2011 Mølgaard–Nielsen D et al. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Joshua Matz
Today’s Petition of the Day is: Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondent this case. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the American Civil Rights UnionAmicus brief of the National Association of Home Builders et al. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
  (Goldstein, Howe & Russell is counsel of record for petitioner in Zuress.) [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm by Christa Culver
”Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Federal Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' reply Amicus brief of Constitutional Law ProfessorsAmicus brief of American Association of Exporters and Importers et al. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:15 pm by Conor McEvily
”Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Federal Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Constitutional Law ProfessorsAmicus brief of American Association of Exporters and Importers et al. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am by Nabiha Syed
  Amanda Rice of Just Enrichment (who also does the Thursday round-up for this blog) discusses one of those cases, The Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela et al. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:56 am by Kali Borkoski
  [Disclosure:  Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioners in Freeman.] [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:55 am by Charon QC
  But even barristers, as sole practitioners, have to be alive to running their practices as a business if they are to make the money they wish to make and be alive to marketing et al. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Christa Culver
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the Cato InstituteAmimcus brief of National Apartment Association et al. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:59 am by war
See also the incisive discussion as to what constitutes a dispute in Tjong Very Sumito v Antig Investments at 747 and following, and Sutton et al, Russell on Arbitration , 23rd ed (2007) at [5-003]. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:10 am by Lyle Denniston
So heavy was the defense of corporate expression in the opening stages of the argument in Sorrell, et al., v. [read post]