Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 241 - 260 of 520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2016, 7:27 am by MBettman
On behalf of SERB, the attorney general’s office argued that what happened in the case was such a rare occurrence that no useful general rule of law could be written. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am by MBettman
The Antoons argue that because the qui tam action was filed within one year of the dismissal of their state case, the state claim was preserved by Ohio’s saving statute, R.C. 2305.19(A). [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 7:02 am by MBettman
So, Judge Barrett held that “[t]he only reasonable interpretation of R.C. 2961.01 appears to be that because Plaintiff’s sentence has been judicially stayed, she has been judicially released for the time being. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:10 am by MBettman
In a 4-3 opinion, the court struck down R.C. 2907.03(A)(13) on its face, on equal protection grounds. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
” The subsection which the court struck down is part of Ohio’s broad sexual battery statute, R.C. 2907.03. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
  R.C. 5709.121, which contains an expanded definition of “exclusive charitable use”, residential use doesn’t defeat the exemption so long as such use is purely incidental to the charitable purposes of the property owner. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am by MBettman
Key Precedent R.C. 2151.03(A)(2) (A neglected child is defined as any child “who lacks adequate parental care because of the faults or habits of the child’s parents, guardian, or custodian. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:09 am by MBettman
(“[T]here is a significant difference between being a party that cannot obtain judgment on the note and being a party that is not entitled to enforce the note under R.C. 1303.31(A) (UCC 3–301). [read post]