Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 241 - 260
of 68,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2008, 8:25 am
Newport City Council v Charles; [2008] WLR (D) 245 “A local authority's right to possession against a person succeeding to a tenancy on the death of a family member other than a spouse on the ground that the accommodation was more than he reasonably required was not an interest in land capable of giving rise to a proprietory estoppel against the tenant. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 5:48 pm
Brandeis School of Law, I will, from time to time, be contacted by someone wanting to know if we have anything relating to Harlan’s famous dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
R v Seddon; [2009] WLR (D) 88 “In a European arrest warrant which sought a defendant's return to this jurisdiction as a convicted person for the extradition offence of blackmail an allegation that the defendant was unlawfully at large and in breach of bail did not amount to ‘an offence disclosed by the information provided … [...] [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:36 pm
FISHER; ASHLI SLAWTER, d/b/a A. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Vikram D. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 8:49 am
Smith,.2021 WL 638040 (D. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:43 am
Leo Pharma A/S and another v Sandoz Ltd; [2010] EWHC 1911 (Pat); [2010] WLR (D) 214 “A sealed court order which had been drawn up and agreed by the parties at the request of the court could not be corrected under the slip rule contained in CPR 40.12(1) unless it had an unintended effect which was inconsistent with the intention of the court. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:56 am
Van Colle and another v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] UKHL 50; [2008] WLR (D) 284 “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under art 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the… [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
In Alvarez v Alvarez, 2017 WL 2335600 (D. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:25 am
Regina v S; Regina v H [2011] EWCA Crim 2872; [2011] WLR (D) 363 “Section 46 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 was not incompatible with articles 6 and 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by reason of being too vague and uncertain. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:42 am
Protectacoat Firthglow Ltd v Szilagyi [2009] EWCA Civ 98; [2009] WLR (D) 67 “In determining whether a person who had carried out work for a company was its employee within the meaning of s 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, if the document purporting to retain the services of a person did not represent the [...] [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:56 am
Sinclair v Glatt and others [2009] EWCA Civ 176; [2009] WLR (D) 97 “A receiver appointed pursuant to s 77 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to get in the assets of a convicted money launderer was entitled to recover his remuneration, costs and expenses from the realisable assets caught by the order. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:21 am
June 21, 2011, Minora, J.), Judge Carmen D. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
LottoTron, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 12:59 pm
Anderson’s sole ... [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:13 am
Criminal procedure — Probation violation — ‘Obey all laws’ condition After the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County revoked his probation, D’Anthony Watts, appellant, filed an application for leave to appeal claiming that the circuit court erred in finding that he had violated the condition that he “obey all laws” because that condition was not ... [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:02 am
Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2010] WLR (D) 248 “S 49A(1)(d) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 required a local authority, in carrying out its functions under Pt VII of the Housing Act 1996, to take due steps to take account of a disabled persons’ disabilities. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
(Sindell v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 2:43 am
SEDLIK v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:41 am
R v K [2008] EWCA Crim 1900; [2008] WLR (D) 294 “A person called to the Bar who had not found a place in chambers but fell within para 206.1 of the Code of Conduct was not thereby ‘authorised’ by the Bar Council to practise as a member of the profession whose members the Bar Council regulated for purposes of s 84 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999; accordingly he was apt to be prosecuted for providing immigration advice or immigration… [read post]
