Search for: "SAID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 241 - 260 of 2,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm by WIMS
The White House said startups bring a wealth of transformative innovations to market, and they also play a critical role in job creation in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am by Robert Kreisman
  Voting in America is a precious right; eligibility is established in the United States Constitution, its amendments, by state laws and by various acts of Congress. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
But in 1990, the Court struck down that law as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:44 am by Jody Simon
The Paramount Consent Decrees went into effect in 1948 following the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:44 am by Jody Simon
The Paramount Consent Decrees went into effect in 1948 following the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:49 pm by Howard Friedman
Nichols & John Witte, Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State (National Report for United States of America), (Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State: Legal Pluralism from a Comparative Perspective, Ed. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Note also that the Court’s fractured decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Let’s begin with the constitutional text, here from section 1 of the 14th Amendment: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:43 pm by John Floyd
More than eight decades earlier (1833) in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:43 pm by John Floyd
More than eight decades earlier (1833) in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:57 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Nat’l Australia Bank, the United States Supreme Court held that U.S. securities laws do not apply extraterritorially. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
(in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (in support of petitioners) [read post]