Search for: "SCOTUS RULING" Results 241 - 260 of 6,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2023, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
EPA wastes tremendous federal, state and private sector resources as the decision of SCOTUS will invariably shift water regulations across the United States yet again significantly. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:27 am by Jon Hyman
For more on this important SCOTUS ruling, you can read the early reactions of some of my blogging friends (I’m certain more of the employment law blogging illuminati will weigh in today and tomorrow): Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog Phil Miles’s Lawffice Space [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 9:38 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The post SCOTUS Sides with Tennessee in Groundwater Dispute appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:22 pm by Howard Bashman
“Federal prosecutors formally seek SCOTUS review of ruling tossing death penalty in Tsarnaev case”: Travis Andersen of The Boston Globe has this report on the petition for writ of certiorari that the federal government filed today in the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:52 am by Howard Bashman
“Judicial Notice (05.27.24): Crash And Burn; Airline attorneys embarrass themselves, SCOTUS issues a big ruling, the NCAA announces a $2.8 billion settlement, and Kirkland takes talent from Milbank. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 6:41 am
The administration and their minions claim the SCOTUS ruling effectually codifies the law and allows the federal government to move forward with their grand scheme to force American's to buy a product (health insurance) regardless of whether they want it or can afford it. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Broc Romanek
Some lower courts had issued preliminary injunctions while SCOTUS was presented with the opportunity to rule on this case. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 10:47 am by Legal Talk Network
They will discuss these wrap-up rulings, get reactions to the rulings and look at what the Supreme Court will look like at the same time next year when we are under the rule of a new President. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled today in Abitron Austria v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:15 am by Matthew Schutte
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's (CAFC's) decision affirming a district court ruling that Ameranth’s patent was ineligible under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 10:19 am
Sure, local rules can always be somewhat complex and complicated, but the SCOTUS rules are especially obtuse in their structure and phrasing. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
For further reading, see our posts: PTO not required to register disparaging trademark until cert deadline passes (Apr. 14, 2016) Supreme Court asked to review disparaging trademarks decision (Apr. 21, 2016) Redskins seek to join Slants case at Supreme Court (Apr. 29, 2016) Federal court affirms cancellation of Redskins’ trademark (July 9, 2016) UPDATE: SCOTUS will review ban on offensive marks (Sep. 29, 2016) Redskins won’t join Slants’ trademark case at SCOTUS… [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
For further reading, see our posts: PTO not required to register disparaging trademark until cert deadline passes (Apr. 14, 2016) Supreme Court asked to review disparaging trademarks decision (Apr. 21, 2016) Redskins seek to join Slants case at Supreme Court (Apr. 29, 2016) Federal court affirms cancellation of Redskins’ trademark (July 9, 2016) UPDATE: SCOTUS will review ban on offensive marks (Sep. 29, 2016) Redskins won’t join Slants’ trademark case at SCOTUS… [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 7:04 pm by Nassiri Law
A negative ruling may have an extremely chilling effect on racial discrimination claims from here to Maine. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 7:04 am by Jane Coleman
Refused to hear an appeal from an Eighth Circuit ruling upholding the law, the only circuit-level court to have addressed the merits of the anti-Israel-boycott statutes. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:35 am by Steve Brachmann
In denying the appeal, SCOTUS leaves in place a divided Federal Circuit ruling that improperly expanded prosecution laches doctrine according to Personalized Media (PMC). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:35 am by Steve Brachmann
In denying the appeal, SCOTUS leaves in place a divided Federal Circuit ruling that improperly expanded prosecution laches doctrine according to Personalized Media (PMC). [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:07 pm by LTA-Editor
” The Court explained that the Markman ruling does not create an exception to Rule 52(a)(6) and the standard of review for fact findings remains clear error. [read post]