Search for: "SEIZURE OF ONE SMITH " Results 241 - 260 of 652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am by Alex Phipps
This summary will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Ford, No. 072613 Conviction for being a felon-in-possession of a handgun and denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence are affirmed over a claim that the district court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress a firearm found on his person because it was obtained during an unconstitutional search and seizure. .. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:39 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 11:06 am by Jeff Welty
The scenarios where this is most likely to matter are ones involving open fields (like Smith), ones involving cars parked in someone else’s driveway (like Labron), or ones involving cars located on undeveloped property. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 pm by Drew Falkenstein
STEC is one of five types of E. coli that causes diarrhea with hemorrhagic colitis. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:48 am
Smith, No. 08–351 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 case involving whether Illinois law provides a sufficiently speedy opportunity for an individual, whose car or cash police have seized without a warrant, to contest the lawfulness of the seizure, a circuit court's ruling reversing dismissal of the action is vacated and the case is remanded where the action was moot because all of the actual property disputes between the parties had been resolved. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:16 pm by Alyson Carney
Whether subjective malice is one of the elements of a 42 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 9:07 am
  I think many of us can say we would not do that, and that "no one can say what they would do under the circumstances" is one of those despicable bits of relativist cant. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
Smith … was turned down … because some time in the remote past he suffered from a venereal disease. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
Smith, unless the contradiction was sufficiently explained. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:28 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Globe independently corroborated that report, as well as why he was willing to turn on his accomplices in the first bank robbery: He believed one of them, Carl Smith, had gotten him arrested. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am by Stephen Wm. Smith
Despite the numbers, one still might question the necessity of Supreme Court intervention here. [read post]