Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF L. A. Vs." Results 241 - 260 of 554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
 The difference in question presented is interesting: Dow: Whether factual findings underlying a district court’s determination on the definiteness of a patent claim under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. 112, like a district court’s factual findings underlying construction of a patent claim, are subject to appellate review only for clear error or substantial evidence rather than de novo review. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Nova raises the interesting question regarding the standard for appellate review of factual findings that serve as the underlying basis for a definiteness determination. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
 Interesting issues, but the case has no chance. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by INFORRM
In conclusion, the Chamber pointed out that it had to ensure that the sanction did not constitute a kind of censorship which would lead people to refrain from expressing criticism as part of a debate of general interest, because such a sanction might dissuade contributions to the public discussion of questions which were of interest for the life of the community. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:10 pm
It is also interesting to compare which possibilities national parliaments have to influence negotiations process. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
At one time you would’ve found them inside the state delegations: huge transformation in means of engagement w/int’l copyright. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:09 pm by Bill Marler
It was so bad, he stated he did not want any more chemo if this was what he had to look forward to every time. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
Waddoups quoted the most offensive passages from Reynolds vs. [read post]