Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M. C., ET AL."
Results 241 - 260
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
C. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 8:24 am
See Brief for Cherokee Nation et al. as Amici Curiae 18 (Cherokee Brief ) ("The State's tale of a criminal dystopia ineastern Oklahoma is just that: A tale"). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
Mohr, et. al. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:14 pm
LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 13.3(c) (noting that the common law rule was that the prosecutor could terminate a prosecution without permission, but that this authority has been constrained over time in some places); Power of Court to Enter Nolle Prosequi or Dismiss Prosecution, 69 A.L.R. 240 (“[A]ccording to the weight of authority, the entering of a nolle prosequi lies in the sole discretion of the prosecuting officer, in the absence of statute. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:23 pm
It could be one of the most interesting professional occupations in which to engage. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”[6] “[A]ny new disclosure requirements [need only] be ‘necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
District Judge Susan C. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Also important is Section 512(c)(c), referred to as the “safe harbor” provision. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:23 am
There is a growing interest in the study of private international law in Africa. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 6:58 am
Google et al, Cal. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
Our excellent pro bono counsel Jeffrey M. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA Decision’). [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
WATSON, P.A. d/b/a WATSON & LENTNER, LAURA M. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Reciting Articles 65(2) and 76 CTMR, it observed that the Court’s scrutiny is limited to the facts, evidence and arguments brought by the parties during the previous proceedings, and to the matters of law thereby examined (Case T-57/03, Société provençale d’achat et de gestion (SPAG) SAS v OHIM). [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
Howell, et al. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider the now infamous case, United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
Reply of petitioners Michigan, et al. filed and more. [read post]
