Search for: "STATE OF MICHIGAN v. EPA"
Results 241 - 260
of 448
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2013, 1:19 pm
See American Road & Transportation Builders Association v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
In the recent policy announcement, EPA stated that, due to Summit, the agency “may no longer consider interrelatedness in determining adjacency when making source determination decisions in its title V or NSR permitting decisions in areas under the jurisdiction of the 6th Circuit; i.e., Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee and Kentucky. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
In the recent policy announcement, EPA stated that, due to Summit, the agency “may no longer consider interrelatedness in determining adjacency when making source determination decisions in its title V or NSR permitting decisions in areas under the jurisdiction of the 6th Circuit; i.e., Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee and Kentucky. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm
Petitioners, including various states (including Michigan) and industry groups, argued that EPA's rules were based on improper constructions of the CAA and were otherwise arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
Fifteen former EPA and state regulators supported NEDC. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:31 pm
Contraceptives: Finally, the District Court in Eastern Michigan enjoined application of the HHS contraceptives rule to several individuals in Legatus, Weingartz, and Weingartz Supply Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
EPA. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:04 pm
The Appeals Court explains, "Two sets of petitioners, hereinafter referred to as 'Industry Petitioners' and 'Environmental Petitioners,' seek review of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) final rule partially approving and partially disapproving the most recent revision to Texas's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)… [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm
Circuit, see, e.g., Michigan v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm
Circuit, see, e.g., Michigan v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:09 pm
EPA, 220 F.3d 683, 690 (5th Cir.2000) (“This Court has held . . [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:50 am
* The states within the geographic boundaries of the Sixth Circuit are Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:57 pm
Instead, EPA quantified States' good neighbor obligations and simultaneously set forth EPA-designed Federal Implementation Plans, or FIPs, to implement those obligations at the State level. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:37 am
Hosp., 488 U.S. 204, 208 (1988); see also Michigan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
Circuit opinion in the controversial E15 (15 ethanol mix with gasoline) split decision in Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm
Before approval by the EPA, a SIP revision is state law for which the EPA's interpretation is not authoritative. . . [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm
EPA, 672 F.2d 42 (D.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
AMREP Corp. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:34 pm
" The Appeals Court said, "We reject the first claim, since the EPA expressly found that the 5.0 mg/L limit was necessary to meet state standards, and that a higher limit would not achieve those standards. [read post]
