Search for: "STATE V. TOWER" Results 241 - 260 of 1,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2010, 6:12 am by NL
Nessa v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2010] EWCA Civ 559 This is an interesting appeal on the issue of the amendment or replacement of a S.125 Housing Act 1985 notice offering the right to buy at a specified price. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am by NL
Nessa v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2010] EWCA Civ 559 This is an interesting appeal on the issue of the amendment or replacement of a S.125 Housing Act 1985 notice offering the right to buy at a specified price. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:40 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiff, Tower Properties LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of New York, operated Nicoles catering hall located in Highland Falls, New York. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:39 am by Patricia Salkin
Smith Communications, LLC v Washington County, 2014 WL 2450067 (WD Ark 6/2/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
19 May 2018, 7:17 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Sarah Grant reported the latest from the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:21 am
  Oh, yeah, and good luck if you want to visit the Eiffel Tower. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:55 am by Katherine Simone
Contributed by: Tyler Powell On June 24, 2021, the Champlain Towers South Condominium Association in Surfside, Florida, collapsed without warning. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 am
Baker,’ and they showed the calls that the phone made, along with the cell phone towers from which each call `pinged’ to connect to the call.The State attempted to admit into evidence the logs of the calls made from [Baker’s] phone. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:15 am by Dave
  HHJ Mitchell quashed that decision, finding that Reg 6(2) operates when a person is no longer working, ie if the illness happens after the applicant lost his job and even if the illness was unrelated to his work; and that he was bound by the decision in FB v Secretary of State for Work  [2010] UKUT 447 (IAC) to find that temporary in para (a) meant not permanent. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:15 am by Dave
  HHJ Mitchell quashed that decision, finding that Reg 6(2) operates when a person is no longer working, ie if the illness happens after the applicant lost his job and even if the illness was unrelated to his work; and that he was bound by the decision in FB v Secretary of State for Work  [2010] UKUT 447 (IAC) to find that temporary in para (a) meant not permanent. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
→Some are questioning whether SCOTUS nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh would uphold the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
→Some are questioning whether SCOTUS nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh would uphold the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]