Search for: "STATE v CASTLE"
Results 241 - 260
of 799
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
It permitted his state-law claims to go forward to trial, however. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 5:08 pm
In last week's Widdison v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
In V.L. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm
Forum non conveniens The Claimant relied on EU case law (Owusu v Jackson (C-281/2002) and Maletic v lastminute.com GmbH (C-478-12)) to argue that the court was precluded from considering forum non conveniens issues. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
Kastle Systems International LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
The Advocate General upheld the General Court’s decision that the State of Bavaria’s EUTM “Neuschwanstein”, a German fairy tale castle and popular tourist attraction, is not descriptive of the goods and services covered by the mark and not therefore not invalid. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 8:46 am
Department of Justice in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
The first is Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:11 pm
It was slow to embrace the ruling in Brown v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am
They might do as the James Castle Collection and Archive (which has the largest privately held collection of Castle’s works) is suing Say and his publisher for copyright infringement in Boise federal court, alleging that many of Say’s illustrations “are intended to evoke and imitate the artistic style of James Castle but some two dozen of the illustrations “are far more than a tribute” and are “similar if not virtually identical… [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
That decision came in June of 2015, with the ruling in California Building Industry Association (CBIA) v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
That decision came in June of 2015, with the ruling in California Building Industry Association (CBIA) v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:00 pm
For more information, please see Stambovsky v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
In 1972, the Court went further and found in Eisenstadt v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
After the Supreme Court’s 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
