Search for: "STATE v CLOSE" Results 241 - 260 of 28,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm by Zachary Spilman
” Nash, slip op. at 13 (citing United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:09 pm by Brad Gould
United States, U.S., No. 23-146, 6/6/24, has thrown an enormous monkey wrench into traditional buy-sell planning for closely held businesses. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 9:52 am by Edward Smith
The incident occurred shortly before 12:20 a.m. along the northbound lanes of State Route 99 near V Street, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) reported. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:13 am
He asked them to send a different message.He then closed by telling the jurors that it was the last he was going to be able to speak to them and told a story. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:31 pm by Norm Pattis
Blue called in sick today, causing another delay in the case of State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:10 am by Matrix LegalĀ  Information Team
This came nowhere close to the type of exploitative conduct at which ECHR, art 4 was aimed. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:16 am by MICHAEL H. ERDMAN
NAR.Discovery closes in a few months (November 21), and NAR's counsel stated that his client would "quite likely" be filing a motion for summary judgment thereafter. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 10:18 pm
Joseph Hospital of Cheektowaga, NY v Novello, (NY S.Ct., Erie Co., Feb. 2, 2007), a New York state trial court rejected a lengthy series of challenges by a Catholic hospital challenging the recommendation by the state's Commission on Healthcare Facilities in the 21st Century that the hospital be closed. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:04 pm
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals will hear oral argument in the case of United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:11 am
The case is a closely-watched lawsuit in which a group of academic publishers sued Georgia State University over its use of copyrighted material in electronic reserves. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:22 am by SHG
And so begins its decision in United States v. [read post]