Search for: "STATE v FRANK" Results 241 - 260 of 4,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190 Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 11:00 am by The Clinton Law Firm
She was unable to state a claim because she could not establish that the lawyer’s legal work was the cause of the termination. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Court finds that this fails to state a cause of action, or worse, that Plaintiff actually did not have a good cause of action. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
In Rev M Burns v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] UKET 1805182/2021, Mr Burns had been an Assistant Chaplain at HMP Wakefield and was dismissed in June 2021 following growing concerns about his performance. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
EFF appealed the case before the state's transparency board, which eventually forced Escobedo to release a slideshow and receipts showing the city had wasted more than 4 million pesos on the Sistema de Predicción de Delitos (SPRED) project. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:24 pm by Amy Howe
Nine years after Brown’s trial, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Holly
March 2, 2023   |   By: David Ludwig   Last month, the Fourth Circuit issued a landmark intellectual property ruling in The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. [read post]