Search for: "STATE v PEOPLES"
Results 241 - 260
of 50,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
Kit Chong Ng and Mubarak Waseem Source: M People, Moving on Up music video. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:35 am
The post State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:11 pm
United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994), and United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm
The defendant denied drinking alcohol to the police officer but stated that the passengers were drinking. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:58 am
On June 26, 2017, I rejected the proffered plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:19 pm
But grabs two out-of-state cases to say that it should count as battery. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:15 pm
The post Skilling V. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:22 pm
The People stated that the unchallenged abstract showed that the defendant was aware that his license was suspended three days prior. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm
You can peruse the respondants brief below, wherein they agreed with Wooley on appeal - which should result in a reversal of the conviction.IN THESUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIACOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, APPELLATE DIVISIONTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,Plaintiff/Respondent,v.ANDREW WOOLLEY, Defendant/Appellant. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am
[Abigail] Moncrieff’s brief argues the petitioner’s interpretation of the statute would render the statute unconstitutional under two principles of federalism: that Congress can't coerce states into implementing federal programs, and that all states must be treated equally.As Koppelman notes below, the same states' rights ideas at the core of the conservative win in NFIB v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
Given the demographic distribution of income and wealth in the United States, that means tax cases are mostly about rich White people. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:44 pm
This is incorrect.First, there is language in Chiafalo v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:22 am
In the case of Shehla Zia v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm
Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 12:32 pm
People v. [read post]