Search for: "STATE v. BRAIN" Results 241 - 260 of 2,688
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2022, 9:38 am by Patrick A. Salvi
Joel: There’s no evil villain necessarily on the other side of the V. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:23 pm by Phillips & Associates
” Furthermore, the report stated that the seminar taught about purported differences between male and female brains, explaining that “women’s brains absorb information like pancakes soak up syrup so it’s hard for them to focus… Men’s brains are more like waffles. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In anticipation or in response, nineteen states have already banned telemedicine visits for abortion medication, and others have put limits on the practice, presumably in the expectation that the Supreme Court will overrule Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 8:57 am by Jordan Schneider
We also discuss: Power hierarchies and identities The “new red scare” and scrutiny on Chinese scientists The Large Hadron Collider as aLanguage as an instrument of state power "Brain drain" and other phrases Yangyang doesn't like Click here to listen to ChinaTalk in your favorite podcast app. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:38 am by RHP
The hippocampus is the central part of the brain dealing with memory. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:57 am by Dennis Crouch
  That 2014 Brain Life decision was followed by a further expansion of Kessler in Speedtrack (Fed. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:21 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Supreme Court in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health, Justice Sotomayor linked abortion and brain death.JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Virtually every state defines a brain death as death. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
” In response to Trump’s feeble attempts to keep his cases in his home court, courts be like: Case citation: Trump v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
The piece considers a new type of rights, neuro rights; the freedom to decide who is allowed to monitor, read or alter your brain. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm by Amy Howe
An intermediate state appellate court upheld the regulation, concluding that it is a “neutral and generally applicable” rule that can survive under the court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]