Search for: "STATE v. BREED"
Results 241 - 260
of 711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2017, 2:27 am
In Markle v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
In Talley v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 4:18 am
In Elliott v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:01 am
” The petition in State of Washington v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 7:15 am
In Stockton v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:55 am
The cost of this disregard of the scientific evidence is borne by landlords, who must waive deposits and accept dangerous breeds like pit bulls or face the threat of HUD action. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
Moreover, the US Department of State Human Rights Report for Uganda cites examples to unlawful killings and torture, and other abuses of detainees and suspects. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
He was counsel of record for the 30 amicus states in Davila v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am
In Powell v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
The United States Supreme Court granted cert this week in Carpenter v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 7:19 am
"[Defendant] imports into the United States the seeds developed from the breeding activities in Spain. [read post]
1 May 2017, 8:04 am
Primo Broodstock, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:03 am
As I pointed out in a previous blog post, Stanford v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Ag Supply v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:07 am
In that state, the law doesn’t presume a dog is vicious or dangerous and in fact, it presumes that regardless of breed, dogs are a harmless breed. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
All in all, it doesn’t seem like a particularly natural breeding ground for libertarians. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:01 am
” In 1931 the Idaho upheld the 1929 law in State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:32 pm
Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
