Search for: "STATE v. EWING" Results 241 - 260 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
To view the judgment in full please click here http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2010/1626.html [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
Morley & Ors, R. v [2010] EW Misc 9 (EWCC) (11 June 2010) – Read judgment Four former Members of Parliament have failed in their initial bid to claim parliamentary privilege in criminal proceedings arising from the parliamentary expenses scandal. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:38 am by Marc DeGirolami
  The first proposition was reinforced by Kennedy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:45 pm by Gideon
In the other criminal justice opinion issued by SCOTUS today, a 6-3 court held in Graham v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 am by Jay Willis
United States and Padilla v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:30 am by Jay Willis
  The editorial agrees with the Justice’s criticism, but it also notes that Justice Kennedy was also part of a five-four majority that rejected a challenge to the law’s lengthy sentences (in Ewing v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 2:49 am by Bystander
I have borrowed this from the excellent Criminal Solicitor dot net site; it deals with an ASBO that appears to have been less than totally successful in bringing an offender to heel:-Heron v Plymouth City Council [2009] This was an appeal by way of case stated against the decision of the Magistrates' Court, who, on the City Council's application, allowed an application to vary an anti-social behaviour order that had originally been imposed on the appellant. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am by Beck, et al.
Ewing, 282 A.2d 206, 222-23 (Pa. 1971) (subsequent drug label change a subsequent remedial measures; admitted under exception to rule); Matsko v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm by georgbrem
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of EW) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2009] EWHC 2957 (Admin) 18 November 2009 Summary and comment by Rosalind English Article 3 does not dictate a minimum standard of social support for those in need, nor does it require the state to provide a home or minimum level of financial assistance to all within its care. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
Scrowther v Watermill Properties [2009] EW Misc 6 (EWCC) Newcastle upon Tyne County Court Continuing the Norwegian theme we appear to have adopted for such cases, here we have a example of an ex-sale and rent back agreement, void and gone to join the choir eternal. [read post]
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Edgartown, MA; Steven Ewing, President) Aquamarine Dredge, Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
 Gathers concluded as follows:  "Since Fields, we have confirmed that '[n]ew legal principles, even when applied retroactively, do not apply to cases already closed.' Davis v. [read post]