Search for: "STATE v. MILKS" Results 241 - 260 of 838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
To base a whole advertisement around a lie, and a voiceover that says MILK, MILK, MILK, MILK over and over again is misleading. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
To base a whole advertisement around a lie, and a voiceover that says MILK, MILK, MILK, MILK over and over again is misleading. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am by Jorge Miranda
For Part I click here, for Part II click here, for Part III click here, for Part IV click here, for Part V click here, for Part VI click here. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:00 pm by Jon Katz
Virginia criminal attorney says that Curley further entrenches our over-policed society We live in an over-policed society where law enforcement is permitted by the United States Supreme Court to make pretextual traffic stops for the purpose of investigating for criminal activity, and where the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure is watered down by such SCOTUS rulings as Terry v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table 1: Sales Tax Treatment of Food is Haphazard in State Tax Codes Unequal Treatment of Groceries, Candy, and Soda in State Tax Codes as of January 1, 2018 State State General Sales Tax Grocery Treatment Candy Treated the Same as Groceries? [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In other words, Roberts and Ginsburg were in unexpected positions.This reminded me of another Supreme Court case pertaining to state tax issues, 2015’s Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
A registry will be created by IMPI with the aim of recognizing GIs and AOs protected abroad, in accordance with the international treaties and the provisions established in Chapter V. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
The state court agreed, and when the case was removed to federal district court (because the parties are citizens of different states), the federal court inherited the seal. [read post]