Search for: "STATE v. MURRAY"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2021, 2:56 pm
["After Murray relocated to another state, he contacted the Oceanside Police Department. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:42 am
Murray et al. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court case Murray v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
” United States The US songwriter Phoebe Bridgers is being sued for defamation by producer Chris Nelson, who claims she “intentionally used her high-profile public platform on Instagram to publish false and defamatory statements regarding [Nelson] in order to destroy his reputation. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
It is approved by Montana for CLE credit and credits may be available for other states too. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm
, heard 15 and 16 June 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Lloyd v Google, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 (UKSC) Kumlin v Jonsson, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
Murray, No. 2020-SU-000629 (C.P. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:21 am
Souza v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:19 am
Murray et al. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
A podcast on Buchanan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 8:15 am
This kind of “expert” testiony is routinely upheld by Texas courts of criminal appeals as evidenced in a 2020 decision, Murray v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Tuttle, The Radical Uncertainty of Free Exercise Principles: A Comment on Fulton v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:17 pm
The event took the form of an interview in which Barrett (the professor, not the justice) posed questions to Murray about the state of the court. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
, heard 15 and 16 June 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Lloyd v Google, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 (UKSC) Kumlin v Jonsson, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
