Search for: "STATE v. ROMAN" Results 241 - 260 of 1,363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am by Howard Friedman
He sought their return, their exclusion as evidence in his upcoming state criminal trial, dismissal of criminal charges against him and millions of dollars in damages.In Doe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:38 am
This confirms the common law requirement that the dwelling to be let must be in the condition fit for the purpose for which it is let when handed over to the tenant, and the landlord must maintain the premises in that condition (Viljoen v Cleaver 1945 NPD 332 at 336).The well-known case courts generally refer to is Hunter v Cumnor Investments 1952(1) SA 735 (C), which confirms the contract of lease principle in Roman-Dutch Law that the landlord is obliged to repair defects… [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Khandare, The Concept of Marriage and its Form: An Indian and Western Perspective, (International Journal of Scientific Research, Volume : 4 | Issue : 12 | December 2015).From SSRN (Canada):Dia Dabby, Constitutional (Mis)Adventures: Revisiting Quebec's Proposed Charter of Values, (2015) 71 S.C.L.R. (2d) 353-383.Howard Kislowicz, Loyola High School v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 5:57 pm
The complaint (full text) in Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Acosta-Roman, No. 071238, 071239 Appeal from sentence of three concurrent fifty-seven month sentences for three money laundering counts is dismissed where: 1) defendant's waiver was both valid and enforceable as an enhacement issue; and 2) appellate consideration of that issue, on the merits, was barred. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 12:07 am by Josh Blackman
This post is the second installment in my series on Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:05 am by Thomas Swartz
And that such a fiduciary relationship must exhibit the characteristics of:de facto control and dominance (Marmelstein, 11 NY3d at 21).Last week the Court of Appeal was faced with another breach of fiduciary claim by a congregant  in Doe v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester, 2009 NY Slip Op 02264. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:42 am by ADeStefano
In Roman v A1 Limousine, Inc. (76 AD3d 552, 552-553 [2010]), the Second Department declined to follow Tselebis, noting that it was inconsistent with the decision of the Court of Appeals in Thoma v Ronai (82 NY2d 736, 737 [1993]).As such, a majority of the First Department stated in Calcano: "Needless to say, it is not this Court's prerogative to overrule or disregard a precedent of the Court of Appeals. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:27 am
  Chun was the name of the lead defendant in New Jersey’s state-wide battle over its new breath test machine. [read post]