Search for: "STATE v. VIGIL"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2020, 9:50 am
Many states, including Illinois, are gradually beginning to ease their COVID-19 restrictions. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 6:40 am
LEXIS 42679 (SD CA, April 20, 2011), a California federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that he was not allowed to attend religious services.In Vigil v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 10:26 am
Yesterday the Justice Department filed its Brief in Support of Rehearing En Banc By the Full Court in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:28 am
”While the Commission found that “NYPD had no written standard on the condition of sleep apnea,” the court said that there was a written standard that was given to the Commission in which it stated that sleep apnea “can be detrimental to job performance when vigilance is necessary. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"While the Commission found that "NYPD had no written standard on the condition of sleep apnea," the court said that there was a written standard that was given to the Commission in which it stated that sleep apnea "can be detrimental to job performance when vigilance is necessary. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
In the recent case of Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:12 am
In Biden v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:34 am
Supreme Court Ruling In Augustus, et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:13 pm
But that's what United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
Written by: Andrew Royce Some alarm has been raised among the real estate bar by the recent decision of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit in Steven Weiss, Chapter 7 Trustee, v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:37 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:09 am
Pakdel v City and County of San Francisco, No. 20–1212, 594 U. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
More than a dozen such motions were brought on Monday in Boston’s federal jury trial of United States vs. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 3:04 am
Inc. v Vigilant Ins. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 7:00 pm
In 2009, the Bombay High Court in the case of Shilpa Vishnu Thakur v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:15 am
The court made it clear in Packington v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am
At the NCSL blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Monday’s opinion in Herrera v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:48 am
First, I must extend thanks to all citizens of the Scruggs Nation who are so vigilant in trying to keep me informed. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 9:36 am
United States v. [read post]
