Search for: "STEIN V. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 5:00 pm
CONTRACTS, HEALTH LAW, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW Goldman v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
At The Huffington Post, Jeffrey Young and Sam Stein focus on a brief filed by Rep. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:14 am
Stein, better known as the KPMG case. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
Stein, January 25, 2021, Jacobs, D.).Bermudan companies. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm
Whilst the outcome was not surprising, Antonios suggests that the CJEU missed an opportunity to correct the flaws in previous case law, and also highlights concerns about the limits of Member States’ discretion when transposing and interpreting EU law.Intellectual PropertyAnna Maria Stein outlined the findings from a report on 'Emerging public perceptions of intellectual property in UK media,' released by the UKIPO last month. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Fraser & Angela V. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
Supreme Court Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein, in a recent decision in R. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:57 am
“A violation of Judiciary Law § 487 requires an intent to deceive (see Judiciary Law § 487), whereas a legal malpractice claim is based on negligent conduct” (Moormann v Perini & Hoerger, 65 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]). [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 3:58 am
(Reem Plumbing), and the Estate of Steven Stein (Stein) ( collectively, plaintiffs) against defendants Altschul & Altschul, Mark Altschul, Esq. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
On November 8, Sotomayor presided over a Supreme Court Historical Society re-enactment of Clay v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
Stein, see Kirk v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:40 am
The law does not prohibit, "in an absolute sense, the matter decided by the arbitrator" and his decision does not so violate of "well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law" as to offend public policy.Justice Cardona, with Justice Stein concurring, dissented, stating that “The state's strong public policy against retaliatory personnel actions is expressed by the enactment of whistleblowers' statutes such as Civil Service Law… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:57 am
The law does not prohibit, "in an absolute sense, the matter decided by the arbitrator" and his decision does not so violate of "well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law" as to offend public policy.Justice Cardona, with Justice Stein concurring, dissented, stating that "The state's strong public policy against retaliatory personnel actions is expressed by the enactment of whistleblowers' statutes such as Civil Service Law … [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 9:16 am
Related Cases: White v. [read post]
