Search for: "STEPHENS v. BROWN" Results 241 - 260 of 716
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
AFSCME to recognize public employees’ First Amendment rights against forced union agency fees [Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Aaron Barnes] More: Shapiro and Frank Garrison, National Review; Cato Podcast with Jacob Huebert and Caleb Brown; Silvester v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Hoping to blame Pacific Gas & Electric power lines for Northern California fires, lawyers from coast to coast descend on wine country [Paul Payne, Santa Rosa Press-Democrat] Courts should police lawyers’ handling of class actions, including temptation to sweep additional members with doubtful claims into class so as to boost fees [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Reilly Stephens on Cato certiorari amicus in case of Yang v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
That is the nature of pluralism in a democratic society but it tends to show that, on this topic (and in the words of Browne-Wilkinson V-C in Stephens), there is no “generally accepted code of sexual morality”. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 6:05 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Jerome Brown, No. 111,690 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal; First-degree murderKristen Patty[Affirmed; Nuss; March 23, 2018]Improper publication of autopsy photographsState v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Barbara Moreno
RACE AND ETHNICITY Elwood Watson, Outsiders Within: black women in the legal academy after Brown v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Barbara Moreno
RACE AND ETHNICITY Elwood Watson, Outsiders Within: black women in the legal academy after Brown v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:45 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Which isn't nonsense, but Wurman blows the other folks off pretty quickly.In any event, having now convinced you (Wurman seems to think), the only real question is whether originalism supports Brown v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Sean Burke
In Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:07 am by Ilya Somin
It is ironic that MacLean falsely accuses of James Buchanan and other libertarians of opposing Brown v. [read post]