Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
” But sometimes Marks is difficult to apply; Baze v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
Dist. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
Dist. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
Strangely, the First says that Poradisova v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
Doctrinally, Bank Markazi’s argument was based on a 19th Century precedent, United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:10 pm
Crosswhite cited Nunes v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
The case is South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:33 pm
USA v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 2:09 pm
Strange bedfellows: States, Tribes, and water rights. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In that case, V.L. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 7:18 pm
At the same time, the bill would have a strange effect on the status of Court of Appeals' opinions that are not taken up by the State Supreme Court -- as opinions finding state laws unconstitutional that are not reviewed by the Supreme Court would appear to run afoul of the law and therefore be invalid.Democrats in the Republican-controlled state senate have spoken out against the law, arguing that it seizes power away from the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:25 am
Strange things are afoot at the SSP! [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:02 am
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
I can't say it any better than Judge Reinhardt, who authors the opinion:"As an "attempt" in the state of California requires only "slight acts in furtherance of the [criminal] design," People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
Here's a snippet:"In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:33 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court decided Jeffrey Cookson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
On March 19, 2007, the United States Supreme Court heard this "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case, formally known as Morse v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:24 pm
I can grok that.But it nonetheless seems a little strange to say -- as Justice Nicholson does here -- that because FELA is a substantive statute with special rules, the applicable rule in state court is not a FELA-specific rule, but rather Rule 68. [read post]
