Search for: "Sarah R. Thomas" Results 241 - 260 of 435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Blackstone catalogued two main categories of opinion bans: offenses against God and religion and offenses against crown or government.3 Ofseyer notes that American liberal thinkers of the time, particularly Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, sharply disagreed with this view of the law as Blackstone described it: Diversity of opinion is … the healthy product of freedom of thought and speech: “In every country where man is free to think and to speak, differences of opinion will… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Ross, The Supreme Court’s renewed focus on inefficiently structured joint ventures, 14 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LAW 261 (2011)Heather R. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by An Hertogen
Chelvan, Sabine Jansen, Jenni Millbank and Thomas Spijkerboer. [read post]
by NYU Journal of International Law and Politics Panel 3 of the NYU JILP Vol. 44:2 Online Symposium   Thomas Spijkerboer is professor of migration law at VU University Amsterdam. [read post]
Chelvan, No5 Chambers Sabine Jansen, COC Netherlands Jenni Millbank, University of Technology Sydney Thomas Spijkerboer, VU University Amsterdam The editorial board of the NYU Journal of International Law and Politics would like to deeply thank Opinio Juris and Professor Peggy McGuinness, as well as Professor Hathaway, Jason Pobjoy, Ryan Goodman, and all of the contributors for their work on this symposium. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am by INFORRM
Dirk Voorhoof and Rónán Ó Fathaigh comment on the case here. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:00 am by Joanna Herzik
You can also view Thomas's TexasBar.com profile. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
Over two hundred years have passed since Thomas Jefferson arrived in New York City to assume his duties as the first Secretary of State for our newly formed republic. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]