Search for: "Schneider v. Schneider" Results 241 - 260 of 656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2008, 3:50 pm
Doherty, Bankruptcy Vérité, 106 Mich. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Katherine Shaw
The Court then invoked its increasingly familiar “major questions doctrine” which, as the Court explained in West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm by Wells Bennett
  Prosecutor Mark Schneider told the court that these and other documents had been turned over to the defense recently. [read post]
5 May 2012, 7:49 pm by Jim Chen
Filburn by Agricultural Law, see these posts by Susan Schneider and Jim Chen. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The absence of such privity remains a bar against her estate malpractice claims (Estate of Schneider v Finmann, 15 NY3d 306 [2010]). [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs have sufficiently pled a cause of action for an accounting (Matter of Schneider, 131 AD3d 175, 182 [2d Dept 2015], citing Matter of Vagionis, 217 AD2d 175, 177 [1st Dept 1995]; NY St Bar Assn Comm on Prof Ethics Op 532, *2 [1981]). [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Karen Tani
" Jacoby finds the argument "not entirely persuasive" and questions Schneider's "determination to frame the story as a conflict between heroes and villains," but she gives Schneider credit for finding "fresh material and compelling stories. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That said, a breach of contract claim premised upon the assertion that the “defendants overbilled … and performed unnecessary services … is not duplicative of the legal malpractice claim” (Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]