Search for: "Sears Roebuck "
Results 241 - 260
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Sears, Roebuck and Co., 624 F.3d 842, rehearing denied, 627 F.3d 289 (7th Cir. 2010).) [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 10-2407 (7th Cir., 11/02/10). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 624 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 2010), wrote a blistering opinion that discussed the extortionate nature of class action suits and is likely to be frequently quoted extensively by defense counsel in the future. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:42 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., order (7th Cir. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:03 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:58 am
Sears, Robebuck & Co. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:22 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co. is already famous for the suggestion made by plaintiffs’ counsel in oral argument that the Seventh Circuit panel’s three male judges poll their wives to see if they agreed whether the possibility that a stainless steel clothes dryer contained non-stainless components made them fearful of rust damage to their laundry. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:23 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 10-2407 (7th Cir. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 5:29 am
Sears, Roebuck & Company (7th Cir. 11/2/10) [pdf] involves the attempted litigation of multiple class action lawsuits in different states over the issue of whether the advertising of a stainless steel dryer drum was deceptive. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:37 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:18 am
Sears, Roebuck and Company (No. 10-2407). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:00 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co. case. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:51 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 10-2407, Slip op. (7th Cir. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:15 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., No. 10-2407, slip op. (7th Cir. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Sears, Roebuck and Co. ( October 14, 2010) ___Cal.App.4th___ (Second App. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:21 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 231 A.D.2d 17, 660 N.Y.S.2d 402, 406 (1st Dep't 1997)). [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm
Sears, Roebuck and Co. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 6:44 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co.] that gave no reasoning and cited no authority whatsoever. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:31 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 547 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2008), observing that by ensuring that the class action is premised on the realistic prospect of a remedy that the class members could not otherwise obtain, the court is also protecting the interests of absent class members, who may have different interests than those of class action lawyers who want to obtain a fee for providing the same or similar relief. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:48 am
Initially, the major investor and the major advertiser on the site was Sears Roebuck. [read post]
