Search for: "Short Way Lines v. Thomas"
Results 241 - 260
of 567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 8:39 am
The decision came down along ideological lines, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch joining Alito. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Janus v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas is up next with the opinion in Ohio v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:19 am
Take the decision issued in Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
But the reasons that the state cited to justify its decision to focus on race in drawing the district were “simply too thin a reed to support the drastic decision to draw lines in this way,” Alito concluded. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
Justice Thomas argued that the entire “reasonable expectation of privacy” framework from Katz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:18 am
Olmstead v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
” Chief Justice Roberts announces opinion in Carpenter v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
In short, Oil States’ analysis could portend significant curtailment of administrative adjudication, but need not. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
In Benisek v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm
Thomas files an opinion along that line concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, joined by Gorsuch. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:42 am
” Gorsuch announces the lineup, with Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Thomas and Samuel Alito joining him (with Thomas writing a short concurrence). [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm
The bottom line, in our view, is that Mueller would probably prevail if and when a battle over a grand-jury subpoena makes its way into court. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Justice Kennedy was joined only by the Chief Justice and Justice Thomas in Parts II(A), (B)(2)-(3) and III. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:32 pm
For instance, they describe a a short but telling November 2017 exchange between Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Scott Gant (counsel for the Department of the Interior) in the case of Patchak v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
” Steele v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
”Justice Thomas was wrong about the bottom line in Obergefell, because he failed to take seriously the equal protection argument for same-sex marriage in states that recognize opposite-sex marriage. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Stanley Fish This brief essay was delivered as a response to a paper co-written by Justice Thomas R. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Stanley Fish This brief essay was delivered as a response to a paper co-written by Justice Thomas R. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:40 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
