Search for: "Small v. Small" Results 241 - 260 of 24,764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2012, 2:51 pm by BuckleySandler
According to a press release, the bill seeks to  (i) ensure that a third party doesn’t gain control of a consumer’s account through remotely created checks, (ii) allow consumers to cancel a debit in connection with a small-dollar loan, (iii) require all lenders, including banks, to abide by a state’s rules for small-dollar, payday-like loans they offer customers in the state, (iv) ban lead generators and anonymously registered payday lending websites, and… [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 9:16 pm
Thanks to Nina Kaufman for quoting my post  "Employees v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Contrary to the learned judge, I really don't think the phrases "I said, what what, in the butt" and "you want to do it in my butt, in my butt" are all that "cryptic. [read post]
5 May 2011, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This standard applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (see Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:18 am by gmlevine
The threshold requirement sets a low bar but small differences “can have a major effect on the way domain names are read,” Travellers Exchange Corporation Limited v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
Leave a comment on 401(k)s for Small Law Firms [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 7:58 am by Mark Astarita
Small businesses play a crucial role in our nation’s economy,” said SEC Chair Mary Jo White. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:28 pm by Gary Johnson
  You can find the original filing in my earlier blog post http://www.garycjohnsonlaw.com/Wordpress/2010/04/florida-colorado-v-us/ . [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm by Ted Frank
Yesterday, MI's own Jim Copland spoke with Jim Blasingame on the Small Business Advocate radio show about Wal-Mart v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
 Plaintiff filed a UCC-1 Financing Statement and sent Notice Letters to small business finance lenders, including a predecessor-in-interest to Defendant. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 2:33 am by sally
O’Beirne v Hudson Court of Appeal “Where a consent order provided for costs to be assessed on the standard basis, the costs judge was not entitled to vary that order or tie himself to assessing by reference to the small claims track. [read post]