Search for: "Smith v. Superior Court"
Results 241 - 260
of 922
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2019, 4:00 am
Canadian superior courts have jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
" Tucker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
The court ordered that $1,556 of the refund be applied to cure an arrearage in plan payments, $444 be paid to the debtor, and the balance be held by the trustee pending further order of the court. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
Landlord’s last bastion was an attempt to point to more recent developments.So looking, the Court turned its focus to Ceccone v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Unlike the Brookings report, the list that follows is not based principally on court documents. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 7:23 pm
Justice Rady of the Superior Court outlined the public interest purpose of the anti-SLAPP provisions, but also relied extensively on the 2015 decision of Baglow v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
In the case of Mader v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Khan v Orbis Business Intelligence Limited 20 September 2018, DC Superior Court (United States) A case which covered statements made by Christopher Steele, former MI6 officer, in a Fusion GPS dossier regarding three Russian oligarchs and their links to the Trump campaign. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Koziar v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 8:55 am
The law is not as clear in Maine, as the state’s highest court has not adopted the Luhrmann standard, and in fact a 2013 Maine Superior Court ruling rejected the standard in Campbell v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 10:20 am
In Washington v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm
Smith) get locked up for 15-plus years, with no end particularly in sight. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 11:36 am
Superior Court (Smith), No. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am
There will be a discussion after Smith’s presentation moderated by Darrell West. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 6:50 am
The defendant was convicted in district court and appealed to superior court. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:14 pm
Citing the Ninth Circuit in Batzel v Smith, the court agreed that for Section 230 purposes, no logical distinction could be drawn between a defendant who actively selects information for publication and one who screens submitted material and removes offensive content. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Oral argument was held the following day before a panel of this Court. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:42 pm
You can summarize this opinion fairly easily:Give the guy back his weed.It's not illegal under state law, so the state can't keep (or destroy) it if he's not charged with a crime. [read post]
