Search for: "South Carolina v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 11:58 am by Deepak Gupta
DRI -- The Voice of the Defense Bar (Kevin Newsom) Equal Employment Advisory Council Law Professors (Andrew McBride) New England Legal Foundation Pacific Legal Foundation The States of South Carolina and Utah [Disclosure: Deepak Gupta and Scott Nelson of Public Citizen Litigation Group are lead counsel for the respondents in AT&T v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:15 am
Instead, pursuant to Rule 46, Rules of Practice of the South Carolina Supreme Court, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina certified a question to the South Carolina Supreme Court. 278 S.C. at 647-48, 300 S.E.2d at 735. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:40 am by Kent Scheidegger
Senator John Chafee of Rhode Island named his son Lincoln, but maybe he should have named him Calhoun, after the South Carolina leader who believed states could nullify federal laws. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Amy Howe
” In the wake of the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
  In South Carolina v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:44 pm
Good --Notes and Questions --A Note on Legalization of Hierarchies of Law Through Statutes --Constitution of the United States --Indiana Code --Notes and Questions --PruneYard Shopping Center v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am by Brian A. Comer
  This system, which was not included in the 2009 vehicle, has a rollover sensor that deploys the curtain shield airbags when it senses the car is rolling over.Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court of the District of South Carolina, Aiken Division. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
At the same time, he studied law under Samuel Johnston, a local lawyer and the future first United States Senator from North Carolina. [read post]