Search for: "South v. South"
Results 241 - 260
of 17,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
PRESS RELEASENo. 2024/216 March 2024Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocidein the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:37 pm
By: Loyd Willaford and Clive Pontusson In Addison v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 9:09 am
Although it is a case out of Virginia, the decision in Sainani v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 1:06 pm
Hardy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:16 am
Secondary Obligations in Korea Courts Liquidated Damages v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:09 am
Muntjan, appellant, filed a complaint with the Maryland Insurance Administration (“MIA”) challenging the decision by Selective Insurance Co. of South Carolina, appellee, to raise his automobile insurance premiums. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:58 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of McMahan v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:58 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of McMahan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 5:42 am
Citing Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:55 am
In the case of Chestnut v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 10:55 am
In the case of Chestnut v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 12:16 pm
In the recent case of Lawing v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:01 am
A recent decision handed down by the South Carolina Supreme Court in Patton v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 4:32 pm
On 21 August 2019, Phineas Mojapelo, the Deputy Judge President of the South Gauteng Division of the High Court in the case of, Nelson Mandela Foundation Trusts v Afriforum NPC ([2019] ZAEQC 2) ruled that the display of the pre-1994 South African flag – the apartheid flag – constitutes hate speech. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 10:28 am
(Nepotism is a South Dakota tradition.) [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 11:06 am
My thanks to Evelyn Brody for bringing the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Wilson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:00 pm
In Moeckly v. [read post]
20 Mar 2021, 6:13 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:35 am
In the case Phelan v Phelan 2007 (1) SA 483 (C) (judgment date 27 July 2006), the High Court of South Africa (Cape Provincial Division) confirmed the conflict of law rule that the place of marriage celebration determines the validity of the marriage. [read post]
