Search for: "Stanford Trust Company" Results 241 - 260 of 401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 12:00 am by David Jensen
Last January, Trounson strongly backed a $40 million award to a Stanford-led consortium that also involved one of Weissman's top associates. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:45 am
Google’s answer at DMV workshops in March 2014 and May 2013 was, essentially, “trust us” (video, video, video). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:41 pm
Google’s answer at DMV workshops in March 2014 and May 2013 was, essentially, “trust us” (video, video, video). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:52 am
Stanford International Bank, Ltd., Stanford Group Company, and Stanford Trust Company, Ltd. 9. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:37 am by Daniel Nazer
The guide discusses the business models, and suggests some pros and cons, of three defensive aggregators: Allied Security Trust, RPX, and Unified Patents. [read post]
14 May 2014, 1:42 pm by Jayne Navarre
Certainly small beans in the shadows of Madoff and Stanford, but in this case, I was victim too! [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
A patent holder could be: (1) a University; (2) an Individual Inventor/Family Trust (e.g, GeoTag); (3) a large Patent Aggregator (e.g., Acacia); (4) a Failed Operating Company or Failed Start-up; (5) a Patent Holding Company that appears unaffiliated with the original inventor or owner; (6) an Operating Company; (7) an IP Holding Company affiliated with an operating company; or (8) a Technology Development Company (e.g., Walker Digital).… [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:48 pm by Chuck Cosson
It can be the case that trust-enhancing regulation compensates for these costs. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:37 pm by The Dear Rich Staff
You can hire the Copyright Office for $165 an hour, or you can hire a private company to perform the card catalogue search. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   Independent Film & Television Alliance: While commercial filmmakers have lawyers, ordinary people can’t be trusted to identify when they’re making fair uses. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Catherine Sanders Reach
Several of the law reviews and legal journals (such as the Stanford Technology Law Review), working papers, and reports are available online only. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
The Media Reform Coalition argues that the clauses are crucial: “Without a requirement to show damage, there is a danger that companies can use libel courts as an arm of their PR operations, simply suppressing what they don’t want in the public sphere“. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 8:21 pm by Ryan Calo
  I presented and commented on this research at a Center for Law and the Biosciences journal club last week that should eventually find its way to the Stanford Law School YouTube channel. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
Out of 165 cases decided at summary judgment, we did not find a single one in which a patent monetization entity, individual or trust bringing the lawsuit won. ... [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 5:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Most other companies use reporting agents. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Research with Alec Halderman: a major record company was shipping CDs that installed spyware. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Mobile Privacy Disclosures: Building Trust Through Transparency (FTC Staff Report, February 2013). [read post]