Search for: "Stanley v. State "
Results 241 - 260
of 1,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:53 am
Stanley, 16 N.Y.S.3d 898 (N.Y. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 8:33 am
Morgan Stanley and Schmell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 9:26 am
" One part of the interview that particularly caught my eye is Driver's revisionist account of Brown v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Did it merely eliminate state laws that either mandated or permitted school segregation? [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 10:05 pm
He was named the Stanley V. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
That distinction goes to Stanley Matthews, who was confirmed by a vote of 24-23 in 1881. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:49 am
Implied Bias Case The Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:17 am
See Brill & Meisel v Brown, 113 AD3d 435, 436 (1st Dept 2014). [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:37 am
Gillian Metzger is the Stanley H. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:56 am
., Citibank, N.A. and Morgan Stanley & Co. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
REV. 991 (2018); U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-12 Excerpt: Parts I, II, IV and V[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:42 pm
See Hasko v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am
“The critical question in determining whether an action sounds in medical malpractice or simple negligence is the nature of the duty to the plaintiff which the defendant is alleged to have breached” (Stanley v Lebetkin, 123 AD2d 854, 854 [2d Dept 1986] [citations omitted]). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am
Rules of Court, rule 8.548), we agreed to answer the following question: Does the federal Fair Labor Standards Act’s de minimis doctrine, as stated in Anderson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, is “a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
