Search for: "Starks v State"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2022, 4:36 pm
Manuel Cepeda Vargas v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, for example, recently ruled in the Epic v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
The court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 7:17 am
” EPLic stated: “The encyclopedic . . . [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Roper v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 1:48 am
(T 966/18) (14 July 2021)Bayer v Teva: Drug fo [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am
” The alleged illegal financial incentives constituted alleged violations of the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute, which aims to “make sure that any kind of testing or medical service provided to patients is medically necessary and not predicated on a preexisting financial or gift-giving relationship,” the WNN article states. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:45 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument on the controversial issue in the highly publicized case of Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:21 am
Stark following oral argument in Invitae Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:21 am
States will rush to ban abortion at virtually any point in pregnancy. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:22 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
” Breyer and Kagan echoed Sotomayor’s sentiments, although in slightly less stark terms. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:11 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
(We recently marked the 50th anniversary of Younger v. [read post]