Search for: "State in the Interest of Jane Doe" Results 241 - 260 of 952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 12:09 am by Neil Wilkof
So, "Catcher in the Rye" may be a wonderfully creative book title, but it does not enjoy copyright protection.Still the Circular does hold out a ray of hope, noting that- [u]nder certain circumstances, names, titles, or short phrases may be protectable under federal or state trademark laws.But those special circumstances turn out to be limited. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:44 am by SHG
Suppose Jane Doe (16) gives legal assent to sex with Troy (30). [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
My interests were simply not protected in any meaningful way. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:30 pm by LindaMBeale
As one of the groups exploiting the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision to allow unlimited spending by corporations to influence election outcomes, it does not disclose its donors and it does not report its expenditures on so-called "issue ads. [read post]
11 May 2018, 10:53 am by Stephen Honig
  No, they are interested in the median number, which is just incidental to the intent of the SEC rule. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by SHG
“The A.C.L.U. misled the United States as to the timing of Jane Doe’s abortion,” said Devin M. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Matthew Kahn
Section 1 of the amendment clearly states that if a president dies, resigns or is removed by Congress, “the Vice President shall become President. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Thus, the Court must determine whether the plaintiff has a substantial privacy right which outweighs the strong First Amendment interest in public proceedings articulated in Doe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:44 am
"  The Miami Herald - A "Cruise Travel Section" Masquerading As A "Business Section" Does the Herald contain some interesting travel articles and happy cruise stories? [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:09 am by Joy Waltemath
Although that lawsuit was ultimately settled, in 2016 the named plaintiff in this lawsuit (who is not the same Jane Doe 1 who initiated the 2008 action) brought suit asserting similar misclassification claims. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:00 am by Phyllis Pollack
There is no ulterior motive; but, what Jane does not realize is that it creates a heavy psychological conundrum for me. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am by Robert Liles
Several areas of particular interest during Fiscal Year 2022 currently include: Hospice beneficiary eligibility. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Williams-Yulee does not mark a "clear shift" in this Court's jurisprudence and does not allow for broad restrictions on judicial candidate speech [A.] [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:12 pm by Jane Bambauer
But this adjustment does not necessarily require the dismantling of current regulations. [read post]